Did Renzixing leak information? Was it a real leak or a fake one?

Recently, online platforms, stock forums, and short-video content creators have been widely circulating false claims—such as allegations of massive file leaks, the exposure of internal network data, and a loss of security control—at Renzixing, thereby causing misunderstandings within the market and the industry.
Clarification of Key Facts: There Was No “Hacker Breach,” “Data Leak,” or “Exposure of Commercial Documents”
Online commentary has maliciously misrepresented the regulatory disclosure of financial discrepancies—verified and published in accordance with the law—as “leaks of company documents,” “internal network breaches,” or “data leaks.” This is a classic example of sensationalist rumor-mongering by self-media outlets.
Two points regarding the actual facts
There have been no hacker attacks, no source code leaks, no user data breaches, and no unauthorized exfiltration of confidential internal documents.
National vulnerability databases, cyberspace administration authorities, and public security departments have never reported any major data breaches involving Renzixing. Online claims regarding “source code leaks,” “backend exposure,” or “internet audit data leaks” are merely recycled rumors from years ago; they lack concrete evidence and have never been confirmed by official announcements.
The so-called “public release of documents” refers to mandatory regulatory disclosures, not data leaks.
The accounting errors involving a subsidiary between 2020 and 2022 constituted violations of information disclosure rules and matters requiring financial restatement. The relevant materials were obtained by the CSRC during its formal investigation and subsequently disclosed in accordance with statutory requirements; this does not constitute the theft or unauthorized leakage of the company’s confidential documents.
An In-Depth Exposé of Four Misleading Tactics Used in Online Hype
Tactic 1: Concept Substitution—Framing “Rectification of Information Disclosure” as a “Security Data Leak Incident”
Self-media outlets exploit Renzixing’s identity as a “cybersecurity and data leak prevention vendor” to manufacture traffic through sensationalist contrasts. They deliberately equate financial compliance issues with cybersecurity data leak incidents—an act that is entirely unprofessional and intended to maliciously manipulate public sentiment.
Tactic 2: Recycling Old News—Presenting Decade-Old Vulnerability Rumors as “Latest Data Leaks”
Certain marketing accounts, illicit industry actors, and stock short-selling accounts repeatedly recycle rumors about routine product vulnerabilities from years ago. They exaggerate these into claims of “total source code exposure,” “user data breaches,” and “complete loss of system control”—narratives that are completely divorced from the facts.
Tactic 3: Amplifying Sentiment—Using “ST” Status and Regulatory Penalties to Suggest “Internal Control Collapse,” “Imminent Delisting,” and “Massive Data Leaks”
Regulatory penalties were issued solely for historical financial accounting errors; they had nothing to do with cybersecurity, data security, product security, or the leakage of classified information. Yet, online discourse deliberately conflates the situation with labels like “data leaks,” “insecurity,” and “untrustworthiness” to maliciously damage the company’s brand and market reputation.
Tactic 4: Smearing by Competitors and Market Manipulation via Stock Forums
Certain competitors and short-selling accounts post en masse to create a narrative of irony—claiming that a “data leak prevention company is leaking its own data.” This constitutes commercial smearing and a form of competition based on spreading malicious rumors and manufacturing negative public opinion.